This past weekend I had an enjoyable experience in Ogdensburg, upstate NY at their annual Founder’s Day commemoration of the region’s French colonial history. They held a re-enactment of the French-Indian War, bringing the mid-18th century to life for a couple of days.

One of the events I attended there was a lecture on “18th Century Medicine”, which was enjoyable, not just because of its fascinating content, but because the lecturer was one of the re-enactors, complete with accompanying props, including an amputation saw…….

Things have certainly changed in medicine over the past few centuries. Back then, only men trained as doctors.

 

Men who trained to be doctors would typically use one of two routes:

  • 7 year apprenticeship
  • 4 years university training combined with a 4 year apprenticeship

 

And these doctors came in one of 3 flavors:

  • Apothecaries would typically be responsible for selling medicines, as well as importing other sundries, such as cosmetics, metallics, and even coffee – basically anything that could be sold in a pretty, little jar! They were the professionals who would take advice from the physician or surgeon as to what the patient needed.
  • Surgeons could be found on the battlefield, on naval vessels, or in shops in town. Most surgeries at that time typically dealt with the limbs, predominantly by way of amputation – although others involved simple sutures, bullet extractions, removal of kidney stones, ophthalmology, dentistry, and rarely, caesarian section if called upon by midwives. Amputation around that time had a success rate of 25-40%, and infection represented the primary cause of death following this or any other surgery – especially so because antibiotics were not yet available, so there was no means of preventing infection in patients.  So if you happened to be the first surgical patient of the day, you definitely had a better chance of survival than the 25th patient of the day who was being operated on with the same instruments that probably hadn’t been cleaned since being first used that morning. Anesthetics also had not yet been developed, but at this time, surgical patients would be given a combination of opium and some kind of alcohol (usually rum, brandy, or wine).
  • Physicians would listen to a patient’s symptoms – they were the observers. So, as professionals, they represented the group that did the least, procedure-wise. Typically they’d be sending patients to either the apothecary or surgeon, based on their symptoms.

 

 

Women’s Work:

The role of women in the medical profession seemed to be mostly limited to midwifery and nursing. Although some complications of childbirth might be dealt with by a surgeon or physician, midwifery was typically the job of women.

Interestingly, nursing in the 18th century was considered the “lowest of the low” professions. Nurses tended to be prostitutes or criminals, and instead of healing their patients, they’d usually be found stealing their money, or providing “special comforts” to gentlemen patients…….a far cry from the pivotal role of nurses in medicine today!

 

So yes, thankfully medicine has changed dramatically over the centuries!

 

 

The latest edition of the New England Journal of Medicine describes the results of an interesting series of cases of respiratory symptoms in a group of soldiers returning from deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Eighty soldiers at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, were referred for medical evaluation due to respiratory symptoms between 2004-2009. All were unable to meet US Army fitness standards upon return from duty in the Middle East, suffering exercise intolerance and failure to attain the fitness standard for the 2 mile run – despite having met it prior to deployment. They were otherwise apparently healthy.

Of the 80 soldiers evaluated, 49 of them underwent lung biopsy. Within the group that received biopsies, 38 soldiers were diagnosed with constrictive bronchiolitis – a condition that involves narrowing of the airways as a result of increased amounts of associated fibrous tissue and smooth muscle. Many of these biopsy sections also demonstrated the presence of foreign material in the airways – suggestive of some type of inhalational exposure.

 

The authors discussed the characteristics of these 38 soldiers with constrictive bronchiolitis:

  • Median age at enrollment was 33 years old
  • Various service positions within the Army
  • Normal cardiopulmonary exams, pulmonary function tests, chest x-rays, and CT scans

Many of the soldiers had been deployed to Iraq in 2003, and discussed having been exposed to smoke from sulfur-mine fire, dust storms, and incinerated human waste. So although all had been exposed to something, there was no single exposure that linked them all. Additionally, the constrictive bronchiolitis was not limited just to these soldiers who had been exposed to something.

 

Image from NEJM July 2011; 365:222-230

Constrictive bronchiolitis, a rare finding in healthy adults, is most typically described in patients with rheumatologic diseases, or in organ transplant patients. It has additionally been associated with inhalational exposure to inorganic dust, and a variety of chemical compounds.

Respiratory problems have frequently been reported in soldiers returning from duty in the Middle East, and although a possible link with some kind of exposure has been suggested, the exact cause remains unknown. This study unveils a key issue – the fact that so many soldiers suffered this problem after deployment raises the question of not just what is causing the problem, but just how many soldiers actually could become affected with by this condition, since no single cause has been identified. The exact nature of the particulate, foreign material found in the airways at lung biopsy also remains unknown, and will require further studies for evaluation.

Importantly too, the soldiers apparently continued to have respiratory symptoms as the study was being followed. Additionally, by 2010, most suffered continued dyspnea after climbing a flight of stairs. Half of the soldiers had even left the Army as a result of disability.

 

King et al: “Constrictive Bronchiolitis in Soldiers Returning from Iraq and Afghanistan” NEJM 2011; 365:222-230.

 

Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, once said: “If you want to study medicine, go to war”.

In 1776 there were only 3,500 physicians in the colonies. These men clearly played a disproportionate role during the Revolutionary War, with around 1,300 of them serving as military surgeons at this time.

During the war, anyone with medical knowledge of any kind was drafted into service, and although all regiments had their own physicians, less than 300 of them actually had a medical degree. The minority had been trained in Philadelphia, at The Pennsylvania Hospital – the first medical school in the Americas, which opened in 1768. Since there were no laws or professional organizations to regulate medicine, however, this left anyone free to practice.

Inevitably therefore, more soldiers died due to health issues than combat during the Revolutionary War.

Anesthesia was not discovered until the mid 1800s, so alcohol and opium were typical agents used for surgical preparation of patients.  Medical equipment and drugs were in very short supply during the war, and physicians were frequently forced to work with what little equipment they had in their pocket kit. Additionally, they typically performed the only surgery that they knew to be useful – amputation. Surgeons had to work fast, since their patients were not anesthetized, and some reports describe things being stuffed into soldiers’ ears so they could not hear themselves screaming! And there was always the method of “biting the bullet”.

Wounded soldiers awaiting surgery were also first bled. Bloodletting was used to treat just about every type of medical illness, based on ancient beliefs that withdrawing large quantities of blood would purge the sick patient of “bad humors”. To add insult to injury, postsurgical procedures also often involved even more bloodletting! Unsurprisingly, surgical success rates were low at this time, with wartime surgeons having no idea that such blood loss could lead to death.

Overall though, despite the fact that professionally trained physicians were rare in the colonial military organization, Revolutionary Wartime surgeons did extremely well at treating the sick, and attempting to save lives. And although no major medical or surgical advances came from the war, one step forward did come in the form of smallpox control.

Smallpox was not a problem in America until introduced here by European settlers. The American Revolutionary War brought about numerous smallpox outbreaks. Patients who actually survive the disease develop lifelong immunity to it, so the British were at a distinct advantage since many of them had previously suffered the disease.

At that time, there were only two ways to deal with smallpox:

  • Isolation: Where susceptible soldiers were quarantined away from potentially diseased people.
  • Inoculation: Where material from smallpox lesions was extracted and injected under the skin of unexposed individuals.

By 1777, the ever increasing smallpox epidemics had led George Washington to order mandatory inoculation of all troops who had not had the disease. Medical historians actually credit this decision as a pivotal one – smallpox threatened to kill more soldiers than the British would, so it was this decision by Washington that allowed the Continental Army to turn the situation around and continue to fight at full strength.

Thankfully huge advances have been made in medicine since the era of the American Revolution. But one thing that remains unchanged is the fact that physicians continue to serve in the US military, helping not only fellow servicemembers, but foreign citizens too. “Service beyond self” clearly remains the mission of both the caring physician and proud military servicemember.

Happy July 4th everyone!

On this day in 1944, Allied Forces stormed the beaches of Normandy, France marking what would become forever remembered as the D-Day invasion of World War II. 



Exact statistics vary across different resources, but some 300,000+ American service members were killed during WWII, and an additional 671,000+ were wounded in action. Since September 11th, 2001, 5000+ service members have been killed, and more than 36,000 have been injured.

In the decades that have spanned the end of WWII and present times, significant advancements have not only been military, but also medical. In tribute to all who have served their countries in wars throughout the world, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has organized “Wounded in Action: An Art Exhibition of Orthopaedic Advancements“.

Currently on display at the Chicago Cultural Center, this exhibition honors the sacrifices made by injured military service members, and explores the emotional aspects of battle injury. Paintings, prints, photographs and sculptures are amongst the 107 pieces of work on display from 77 contributors. Contributing artists include military service members, family members and military surgeons who have cared for the wounded.

If you are fortunate enough to be able to visit this exhibition you’ll see work from Sergeant Pete Damon. Sergeant Damon is an Iraq War veteran who lost parts of both arms in 2003. His artwork is absolutely fantastic and I thoroughly recommend you to at least check out his work on his blog. I’ve seen quite a bit of it, he’s from here in Massachusetts where I live. His story and his talent are extremely inspirational……

…….To put it mildly.