Archives for February 2012

If you’re considering surgery any time soon, you might want to take into account the results of a recent study that unveiled a link between a surgeon’s age and the incidence of complications after surgery.

Antoine Duclos MD, from the University of Lyon, France, and colleagues performed a multicenter study that aimed to evaluate the association between experience and performance of surgeons on post-thyroidectomy complications. They reported their findings in the 2011 issue of the British Medical Journal

In a nutshell, thyroidectomy by surgeons aged 35 to 50 years old (with 5 to 20 years of postgraduate experience) had the safest outcomes. Postsurgical complications, however, were more likely if thyroidectomy was performed by either inexperienced surgeons, or those with 20 or more years of experience. 

According to the researchers, medical specialists tend to reach the peak of their expertise between 30 and 50 years of age, corresponding to about 10 years postgraduate specialty experience. 

The study investigated 3,574 thyroidectomies during a one year period at five high volume academic French hospitals. The surgeries were performed by 28 surgeons, with a mean age of 41 years, and an average of 10 years experience. Patients were assessed over a course of 6 months following surgery, for evidence of two major complications of thyroidectomy – permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism. 

When thyroidectomy was performed by surgeons between 35 and 50 years old (with 5 to 20 years of postgraduate experience), surgical outcomes were better than with younger or older colleagues with respect to both complications. 

The results suggest that the performance of surgeons changes throughout their career. The authors concluded that practising in a high volume hospital does not make up for surgical inexperience, and that surgeons cannot reach or maintain peak performance merely by accumulating additional years in practice. They did state, however, that the influence of other unevaluated determinants may have influenced complication rates, since surgical outcomes are affected by interactions between numerous factors that remain poorly characterized and understood.

d

Image credit wax115 @morgueFile

Yesterday was our AMWA-New England chapter’s Winter Roundtable Brunch at the Hilton Garden Inn in Waltham, MA.

It was a beautiful winter day here – chilly, but bright and sunny with a clear blue sky. Perfect driving weather for those who made the trek from the opposite ends of New England.

I was privileged to be hosting a roundtable discussion on “Blogging for Medical Writers”. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed all the local chapter meetings that I’ve been to, but this one was especially fun, what with the “on that note” digressions that some of our discussions took! But, what happens in AMWA-NE, stays in AMWA-NE, so you’ll just have to use your imagination as to where our conversations were diverted!

There were 7 of us at our table, and the 2 hours just flew by. Thank you so much to the wonderful medical writers in our group for making it such a wonderful, productive, and interactive discussion.

Thanks also to AMWA-NE for organizing the event, and to the Hilton Garden Inn for not only hosting us, but more importantly, keeping us fed and watered!

I put together some notes from our discussion – so if you’ve never tried blogging before, but are think of doing so, they might be of some help to you as you get started. Please let me know if you are a medical writer with an active blog – I’ll add your URL to the list! And similarly if you happen to come across any other active medical writer blogs, I’ll be happy to add those too.

I’m already looking forward to our next local chapter gathering next month!

 

EmmaHitt169x215

Are you thinking about a career in medical writing, but don’t really know much about the field? Listen to this interview with Dr Emma Hitt, a seasoned medical writer in Georgia. Hopefully it will help spur you on in your endeavors! 

Well it finally happened!

I’d procrastinated enough, and eventually managed to make a decision on a business name so that I could purchase the domain and become self-hosted.

I think it’s at least functional here right now, although I’ll be slowly adapting the site more as time goes by, so bear with me!

I’m enjoying it so far though, and I like the new look.

Guess I’d better get my tech-goggles on in case I need to install widgets myself…….I’m shuddering at the very thought of it!

;;

l

Image credit Ambro @FreeDigitalPhotos

 

I recently talked about white papers as a good market for medical writers to tap into. And I additionally wrote this guest post on writing white papers for the medical industry.

But not everyone is a fan of this old favorite!
f

What’s the Problem?
They tend to get a bad rap. Painful, dull, and overlong are just a few adjectives that I’ve seen used to describe these important documents. Yet they’ve been around for some time, and their academic voice remains a high-impact asset in marketing.

Not all white papers are created equally though. Their quality varies widely, depending on the author. When written properly, they can be extremely effective marketing tools, even in simple PDF format. The flip side, however, is that when written poorly, they merely come across as a big old sales pitch in disguise (and sometimes not even in disguise!). A small bias is expected (it’s a document that aims to grab a sale, after all), but if the overwhelming message to the reader is a forceful sales pitch, it may just fall on deaf ears.

One problem with a white paper is its short half-life – once sent out, that’s it, it’s gone. And the reader may not even finish reading it. Another problem is inflexibility of content delivery – even if the reader likes it, he still may not be motivated to contact a sales representative.

Interestingly, many people believe that white papers may be on the way out due to the advent of new 2.0 technologies. Our ever-increasing immersion into the fast-paced digital era has, for better or worse, reduced our attention span. As a result, some feel that traditional white papers are less appealing, whereas digital information delivery allows the reader to become more involved in researching a product, thus enhancing product curiosity.
d

What Alternatives are There?
Consequently many feel that the traditional, thesis-like white paper may be outdated amidst today’s technology. Some businesses are therefore now reaching out to their audience via different platforms, and building client relationships in a more interactive way. A few of these include:

  • Microsites: These can be used to create a marketing message for lead generation. Information that would typically go into a white paper can be placed on the site, but in a more readable and interactive format. Information can be shared there in various formats (such as via a blog, surveys, webinars, and discussion forums to name but a few), and can also be updated as necessary.
  • Twitter: Social networking is becoming another useful method for reaching a target audience.  Twitter is a growing platform for this, with Twitter chats being increasingly used for marketing.
  • eBooks: Their landscape format is favored by some, supposedly because it makes for easier reading. Throw in some embedded links too, or interactive media “bells and whistles” such as video or animation. The finished product may then better engage the reader, increasing his interest, and making him more likely to finish reading it.

f

Where Does the Future Lie?
Having said all this, however, white papers have stood the test of time. After all, companies are still using them, and often still in their very traditional, bland form. Some critics argue that our reduced attention spans actually allow a paper document to function better than digital material. For instance, many people visit many websites, but how long do they stay to read them? Additionally, the viral “here today, gone tomorrow” nature of much digital material these days could work against its effectiveness as a delivery platform for product information.

Personally, despite seeing the value of new technology, I feel that white papers will remain steadfast. I think most of us would agree that attention-grabbing content remains king, regardless of format.  And likely the customer, not the marketer, will have the final say on whether white papers should be axed. At the moment though, there is enough evidence that they remain a valued marketing tool. So although change is always good as a process evolves, I suspect most companies will retain a special place in their heart for these documents. After all, marketing is still marketing, and the factors that drive sales haven’t really changed.

d

So what do you think? Is creativity the new white paper?

d

Image credit Photostock at Free Digital Photos